Thursday, 4 June 2015
Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo Users Threatened by New Security Flaw, Covert Redirect
A serious flaw in two widely used security standards could give anyone access to your account information at Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter and many other online services. The flaw, dubbed "Covert Redirect" by its discoverer, exists in two open-source session-authorization protocols, OAuth 2.0 and OpenID.
Both standards are employed across the Internet to let users log into websites using their credentials from other sites, such as by logging into a Web forum using a Facebook or Twitter username and password instead of creating a new account just for that forum.
Attackers could exploit the flaw to disguise and launch phishing attempts from legitimate websites, said the flaw's finder, Mathematics Ph.D. student Wang Jing of the Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.
Wang believes it's unlikely that this flaw will be patched any time soon. He says neither the authentication companies (those with which users have an account, such as Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn, among others) nor the client companies (sites or apps whose users log in via an account from an authentication company) are taking responsibility for fixing the issue.
"The vulnerability is usually due to the existing weakness in the third-party websites," Wang writes on his own blog. "However, they have little incentive to fix the problem."
The biggest danger of Covert Redirect is that it could be used to conduct phishingattacks, in which cybercriminals seize login credentials, by using email messages containing links to malicious websites disguised as something their targets might want to visit.
Normal phishing attempts can be easy to spot, because the malicious page's URL will usually be off by a couple of letters from that of the real site. The difference with Covert Redirect is that an attacker could use the real website instead by corrupting the site with a malicious login popup dialogue box.
For example, say you regularly visit a given forum (the client company), to which you log in using your credentials from Facebook (the authentication company). Facebook uses OAuth 2.0 to authenticate logins, so an attacker could put a corrupted Facebook login popup box on this forum.
If you sign in using that popup box, your Facebook data will be released to the attacker, not to the forum. This means the attacker could possibly gain access to your Facebook account, which he or she could use to spread more socially engineered attacks to your Facebook friends.
Covert Redirect could also be used in redirection attacks, which is when a link takes you to a different page than the one expected.
Wang told CNET authentication companies should create whitelists — pre-approved lists that block any not on it — of the client companies that are allowed to use OAuth and OpenID to redirect to them. But he said he had contacted a number of these authentication companies, who all shifted blame elsewhere.
Wang told CNET Facebook had told him it "understood the risks associated with OAuth 2.0" but that fixing the flaw would be "something that can't be accomplished in the short term." Google and LinkedIn allegedly told Wang they were looking into the issue, while Microsoft said the issue did not exist on its own sites.
Covert Redirect appears to exist in the implementations of the OpenID and OAuth standards used on client websites and apps. But because these two standards are open-source and were developed by a group of volunteers, there's no company or dedicated team that could devote itself to fixing the issue.
Where does that leave things?
"Given the trust users put in Facebook and other major OAuth providers, I think it will be easy for attackers to trick people into giving some access to their personal information stored on those service," Chris Wysopal, chief technology officer of Boston-area security firm Veracode and a member of the legendary 1990s hackerspace the L0pht, told CNET.
"It's not easy to fix, and any effective remedies would negatively impact the user experience," Jeremiah Grossman, founder of Santa Clara, Calif.-based WhiteHat Security, told CNET. "Just another example that Web security is fundamentally broken and the powers that be have little incentive to address the inherent flaws."
Users should be extra-wary of login popups on Web pages. If you wish to log into a given website, it might be better to use an account specific to that website instead of logging in with Facebook, Twitter, or another authentication company, which would require the use of OAuth and/or OpenID to do.
If you think someone has gained access to one of your online accounts, notify the service and change that account's password immediately.
Related Articles:
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/facebook-google-covert-redirect-flaw,news-18726.html
http://www.scmagazine.com/covert-redirect-vulnerability-impacts-oauth-20-openid/article/345407/
http://news.yahoo.com/facebook-google-users-threatened-security-192547549.html
http://thehackernews.com/2014/05/nasty-covert-redirect-vulnerability.html
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/05/05/facebook-google-users-threatened-by-new-security-flaw/
http://whitehatview.tumblr.com/post/120695795041
http://russiapost.blogspot.ru/2015/05/openid-oauth-20.html
http://www.diebiyi.com/articles/security/covert-redirect/covert_redirect/
http://whitehatpost.lofter.com/post/1cc773c8_706b622
https://itswift.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/microsoft-google-facebook-attacked/
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/2346030512015420103814617/
http://itsecurity.lofter.com/post/1cfbf9e7_72e2dbe
http://ithut.tumblr.com/post/119493304233/securitypost-une-faille-dans-lintegration
http://japanbroad.blogspot.jp/2015/05/oauthopenid-facebook.html
http://webtech.lofter.com/post/1cd3e0d3_6f0f291
https://webtechwire.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/covert-redirect-attack-worldwide/
http://whitehatview.tumblr.com/post/119489968576/securitypost-sicherheitslucke-in-oauth-2-0-und
http://www.inzeed.com/kaleidoscope/computer-security/facebook-google-attack/
Labels:
0day Flaw,
by New Security,
Cnet,
Covert Redirect,
Facebook,
Google,
hacker-prevention,
IT Technology,
Jing Wang,
Linkedin,
Microsoft,
OAuth 2.0,
Open Source,
OpenID,
Tomsguid,
Users Threat,
Web News,
Yahoo
Alibaba Taobao, AliExpress, Tmall, Online Electronic Shopping Website XSS & Open Redirect Security Vulnerabilities
Alibaba Taobao, AliExpress, Tmall, Online Electronic Shopping Website XSS & Open Redirect Security Vulnerabilities
Domains Basics:
Alibaba Taobao, AliExpress, Tmall are the top three online shopping websites belonging to Alibaba.
Vulnerability Discover:
Wang Jing, Division of Mathematical Sciences (MAS), School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.
(1) Domains Descriptions:
(1.1) http://www.taobao.com
“Taobao is a Chinese website for online shopping similar to eBay and Amazon that is operated in China by Alibaba Group.” (Wikipedia)
“With around 760 million product listings as of March 2013, Taobao Marketplace is one of the world’s top 10 most visited websites according to Alexa. For the year ended March 31, 2013, the combined gross merchandise volume (GMV) of Taobao Marketplace and Tmall.com exceeded 1 trillion yuan.” (Wikipedia)
Alexa ranking 9 at 10:40 am Thursday, 22 January 2015 (GMT+8).
(1.2) http://aliexpress.com
"Launched in 2010, AliExpress.com is an online retail service made up of mostly small Chinese businesses offering products to international online buyers. It is the most visited e-commerce website in Russia" (Wikipedia)
(1.3) http://www.tmall.com
"Taobao Mall, is a Chinese-language website for business-to-consumer (B2C) online retail, spun off from Taobao, operated in the People's Republic of China by Alibaba Group. It is a platform for local Chinese and international businesses to sell brand name goods to consumers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan." (Wikipedia)
(2) Vulnerability descriptions:
Alibaba Taobao AliExpress Tmall online electronic shopping website has a cyber security bug problem. It can be exploited by XSS and Covert Redirect attacks.
(3) Alibaba Taobao, AliExpress, Tmall, Online Electronic Shopping Website XSS
The vulnerability can be exploited without user login. Tests were performed on Firefox (34.0) in Ubuntu (14.04) and IE (8.0.7601) in Windows 7.
(3.1) Alibaba Taobao Online Electronic Shopping Website (Taobao.com ) XSS (cross site scripting) Security Vulnerability
The vulnerabilities occur at “writecookie.php?" page with "ck" parameter, e.g
POC Code:
http://www.taobao.com/go/rgn/ tw/writecookie.php?ck=tw"-->'- alert(/justqdjing/ )-'";&redirect=0
POC Video:
Blog Details:
(3.2)Alibaba AliExpress Online Electronic Shopping Website (Aliexpress.com) XSS Security Vulnerabilities
The vulnerabilities occur at “landing.php?" page with "cateid" "fromapp" parameters, e.g
POC Code:
/' "><img src=x onerror=prompt(/tetraph/)>
http://activities.aliexpress. com/mobile_325_promotion_ landing.php?cateid=6&fromapp=/ ' "><img src=x onerror=prompt(/justqdjing/)>
http://activities.aliexpress. com/mobile_325_promotion_ landing.php?cateid=6</script>/ ' "><img src=x onerror=prompt(/tetraph/)><!-- &fromapp=
POC Video:
Blog Details:
(3.3) Alibaba Tmall Online Electronic Shopping Website (Tmall.com) XSS Security Vulnerability
The vulnerabilities occur at “writecookie.php?" page with "ck" parameter, e.g
POC Code:
http://www.tmall.com/go/app/ sea/writecookie.php?ck=cn"-->' -alert(/tetraph/ )-'";&redirect=1
POC Video:
Blog Details:
This vulnerabilities were disclosed at Full Disclosure. "The Full Disclosure mailing list is a public forum for detailed discussion of vulnerabilities and exploitation techniques, as well as tools, papers, news, and events of interest to the community. FD differs from other security lists in its open nature and support for researchers' right to decide how to disclose their own discovered bugs. The full disclosure movement has been credited with forcing vendors to better secure their products and to publicly acknowledge and fix flaws rather than hide them. Vendor legal intimidation and censorship attempts are not tolerated here!" All the fllowing web securities have been published here, Injection, Broken Authentication and Session Management, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Insecure Direct Object References, Security Misconfiguration, Sensitive Data Exposure, Missing Function Level Access Control, Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities, Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards.
(4) Alibaba Taobao(taobao.com)Covert Redirect Security Vulnerability Based on Apple.com
(4.1) Vulnerability description:
Alibaba Taobao has a security problem. It can be exploited by Covert Redirect attacks. Taobao will check whether the redirected URL belongs to domains in Taobao's whitelist, e.g. apple.com
If this is true, the redirection will be allowed.
However, if the URLs in a redirected domain have open URL redirection vulnerabilities themselves, a user could be redirected from Taobao to a vulnerable URL in that domain first and later be redirected from this vulnerable site to a malicious site. This is as if being redirected from Taobao directly.
In fact, Apple.com was found can be exploited by Open Redirect vulnerabilities. Those vulnerabilities details will be published in the near future.
(4.2) The vulnerability occurs at "redirect.htm?" page, with parameter “&url”, i.e.
The vulnerabilities can be attacked without user login. Tests were performed on IE (10.0) of Windows 8, Firefox (34.0) & Google Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0 ubuntu0.14.04.1.1064 (64-bit) of Ubuntu (14.04),Safari 6.1.6 of Mac OS X Lion 10.7.
(4.3) Use a website for the tests,the redirected webpage is “http://www.tetraph.com/blog". Just suppose it is malicious.
Vulnerable URL:
POC Code:
Poc Video:
Blog Detail:
Those vulnerablities were reported to Alibaba in 2014 and have been patched by the security team (just checked). Name was listed in the hall of fame by Alibaba.
Related Articles:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/100http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.fulldisclosure/1503
http://lists.openwall.net/full-disclosure/2015/01/22/8
http://www.tetraph.com/blog/computer-security/alibaba-xss-open-redirect/
http://diebiyi.com/articles/security/alibaba-xss-open-redirect/
http://diebiyi.com/articles/security/alibaba-xss-open-redirect/
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107140622279666498863/posts/QFoYGEjbiTX
https://progressive-comp.com/?l=full-disclosure&m=142196709216464&w=1
https://progressive-comp.com/?l=full-disclosure&m=142196709216464&w=1
https://www.facebook.com/websecuritiesnews/posts/802525526534286
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=841091885926189&id=767438873291491
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=841091885926189&id=767438873291491
http://ithut.tumblr.com/post/ 120682447708/webcabinet- alibaba-taobao-aliexpress- tmall
https://infoswift.wordpress. com/2015/01/27/alibaba-xss- open-redirect/
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/2346030512015545132356/
https://infoswift.wordpress.
http://tetraph.blog.163.com/blog/static/2346030512015545132356/
========================================================
阿里巴巴 淘宝, 天猫, 全球苏卖通 线上电子购物网 跨站脚本攻击 (XSS) & 公开重定向 (Open Redirect) 安全漏洞
域名:
阿里巴巴 淘宝, 天猫, 全球苏卖通 线上电子购物网 是阿里巴巴集团最大的前三家网上购物电子商务网站.
(1) 漏洞描述:
阿里巴巴 淘宝, 天猫, 全球苏卖通 线上电子购物网 有一个安全问题. 它容易遭受 跨站脚本攻击 (XSS) & 公开重定向 (Open Redirect) 安全漏洞攻击.
漏洞不需要用户登录,测试是基于Windows 7 的 IE (8.0. 7601) 和 Ubuntu (14.04) 的 Firefox (34.0)。
(1.1) 阿里巴巴 淘宝 线上电子购物网 (Taobao.com) XSS (跨站脚本攻击) 安全漏洞
漏洞链接地点 “writecookie.php?", 参数 "ck" e.g.
POC:
http://www.taobao.com/go/rgn/ tw/writecookie.php?ck=tw"-->'- alert(/tetraph/ )-'";&redirect=0
POC Video:
Blog Details:
(1.2) 阿里巴巴 全球速卖通 在线交易平台 (aliexpress.com) XSS (跨站脚本攻击) 安全漏洞
漏洞链接地点 “mobile_325_promotion_landing. php", 参数 "cateid" 和 "fromapp" e.g.
POC:
/' "><img src=x onerror=prompt(/tetraph/)>
http://activities.aliexpress. com/mobile_325_promotion_ landing.php?cateid=6&fromapp=/ ' "><img src=x onerror=prompt(/tetraph/)>
http://activities.aliexpress. com/mobile_325_promotion_ landing.php?cateid=6</script>/ ' "><img src=x onerror=prompt(/tetraph/)><!-- &fromapp=
POC Video:
Blog Details:
(1.3) 阿里巴巴 天猫 线上电子购物网 (Tmall.com) XSS (跨站脚本攻击) 安全漏洞
漏洞链接地点 “writecookie.php?", 参数 "ck" e.g.
POC:
http://www.tmall.com/go/app/ sea/writecookie.php?ck=cn"-->' -alert(/tetraph/ )-'";&redirect=1
POC Video:
Blog Details:
(2) 阿里巴巴淘宝线上电子购物网(taobao.com) Covert Redirect(隐蔽重定向跳转)安全漏洞基于 苹果网站
(2.1) 漏洞描述:
阿里巴巴 淘宝购物网 有一个安全问题. 它容易遭受 Covert Redirect (Open Redirect 公开重定向) 漏洞攻击. 所有 属于 Apple.com 的 链接都在白名单内。故而如果 苹果的 网站 本身有 公开重定向问题。那么受害者相当于首先被导向到 苹果官网然后 到 有害网站。 事实上苹果网站被发现有公开重定向问题,过段时间会公布细节。
有漏洞的文件是 "redirect.htm?", 参数 “&url”, i.e.
这个漏洞不需要用户登录。测试是基于Windows 8 的 IE (10.0) 和 Ubuntu (14.04) 的 Firefox (34.0) 及 Google Chromium 39.0.2171.65-0 ubuntu0.14.04.1.1064 (64-bit),Mac OS X Lion 10.7 的 Safari 6.1.6。
(2.2) 用一个创建的网页进行测试,这个网页是“http://www. tetraph.com/blog"。 可以假定这个页面是有害的。
漏洞网址:
POC 代码:
Poc Video:
Blog Detail:
这些漏洞在2014年被报告给阿里巴巴安全应急中心, 到今天已被修补 (刚刚检查), 名字被列在了白帽子名单感谢表里。
Labels:
0day-share,
Alibaba,
AliExpress,
computer-bug,
Electronic Shopping,
hacker-topics,
information,
internet,
jing.wang,
Online,
Open Redirect,
Security Vulnerabilities,
Taobao,
Tmall,
website,
whitehat-tester,
XSS
Wednesday, 13 May 2015
CVE-2014-8489 Ping Identity Corporation “PingFederate 6.10.1 SP Endpoints” Open Redirect Web Security Vulnerability
CVE-2014-8489 Ping Identity Corporation “PingFederate 6.10.1 SP Endpoints” Open Redirect Web Security Vulnerability
Exploit
Title: “Ping Identity Corporation” “PingFederate 6.10.1 SP Endpoints”
Dest Redirect Privilege Escalation Web Security Vulnerability
Product: PingFederate 6.10.1 SP Endpoints
Vendor: Ping Identity Corporation
Vulnerable Versions: 6.10.1
Tested Version: 6.10.1
Advisory Publication: November 27, 2014
Latest Update: December 16, 2014
Vulnerability Type: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site [CWE-601]
CVE Reference: CVE-2014-8489
mpact CVSS Severity (version 2.0):
CVSS v2 Base Score: 6.4 (MEDIUM) (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) (legend)
Impact Subscore: 4.9
Exploitability Subscore: 10.0
CVSS Version 2 Metrics:
Access Vector: Network exploitable
Access Complexity: Low
Authentication: Not required to exploit
Impact Type: Allows unauthorized disclosure of information; Allows unauthorized modification
Author and Writer: Jing Wang [School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (SPMS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore] (@justqdjing)
Introduction Details
(1) Vendor & Product Description:
Vendor:
Ping Identity
Product & Vulnerable Versions:
PingFederate
6.10.1
Vendor URL & Download:
PingFederate 6.10.1 can be gained from here,
Product Introduction Overview:
"An
SP is the consumer of identity attributes provided by the IdP through a
SAML assertion. SP integration involves passing the identity attributes
from PingFederate to the target SP application. The SP application uses
this information to set a valid session or other security context for
the user represented by the identity attributes. Session creation can
involve a number of approaches, and as for the IdP, Ping Identity offers
commercial integration kits that address the various SP scenarios. Most
SP scenarios involve custom-application integration, server-agent
integration, integration with an IdM product, or integration with a
commercial application.
Custom Applications: many applications use their own authentication mechanisms, typically through a database or LDAP repository, and are responsible for their own user-session management. Custom-application integration is necessary when there is limited or no access to the Web or application server hosting the application. Integration with these custom applications is handled through application-level integration kits, which allow software developers to integrate their applications with a PingFederate server acting as an SP.
With these integration kits, PingFederate sends the identity attributes from the SAML assertion to the SP application, which can then use them for its own authentication and session management. As for the IdP, application-specific integration kits include an SP agent, which resides with the SP application and provides a simple programming interface to extract the identity attributes sent from the PingFederate server. The information can be used to start a session for the SP application.
Ping Identity provides custom-application integration kits for a variety of programming environments, including: Java, .NET, PHP.
In addition, Ping Identity provides an Agentless Integration Kit, which allows developers to use direct HTTP calls to the PingFederate server to temporarily store and retrieve user attributes securely, eliminating the need for an agent interface."
(2) Vulnerability Details:
PingFederate 6.10.1 SP Endpoints web
application has a computer security bug problem. It can be exploited by
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (URL Redirection) attacks. This
could allow a user to create a specially crafted URL, that if clicked,
would redirect a victim from the intended legitimate web site to an
arbitrary web site of the attacker's choosing. Such attacks are useful
as the crafted URL initially appear to be a web page of a trusted site.
This could be leveraged to direct an unsuspecting user to a web page
containing attacks that target client side software such as a web
browser or document rendering programs.
Other
similar products 0day vulnerabilities have been found by some other bug
hunter researchers before. PingFederate has patched some of them. Web
Security Watch is an aggregator of security reports coming from various
sources. It aims to provide a single point of tracking for all publicly
disclosed security issues that matter. "Its unique tagging system
enables you to see a relevant set of tags associated with each security
alert for a quick overview of the affected products. What's more, you
can now subscribe to an RSS feed containing the specific tags that you
are interested in - you will then only receive alerts related to those
tags." It has published suggestions, advisories, solutions details
related to website vulnerabilities.
(2.1) The security programming code flaw occurs at “&TargetResource” parameter in “/startSSO.ping?” page.
References:
https://www.mail-archive.com/fulldisclosure%40seclists.org/msg01416.html
http://lists.openwall.net/full-disclosure/2014/12/09/5
https://vulnerabilitypost.wordpress.com/2014/04/29/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity
http://computerobsess.blogspot.com/2014/12/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity-corporation.html
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.fulldisclosure/1302
http://marc.info/?l=full-
http://seclists.org/
http://itsecurity.lofter.com/post/1cfbf9e7_54fc5a7
http://whitehatview.tumblr.com/post/106597418411/ithut-cve-2014-8489-
http://packetstormsecurity.
https://itswift.wordpress.com/2014/12/30/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity-url_redirection
http://securityrelated.blogspot.com/2014/12/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity-corporation.html
http://www.osvdb.org/show/
http://mathswift.blogspot.com/2014/12/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity-corporation.html
http://www.inzeed.com/kaleidoscope/computer-security/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity
http://diebiyi.com/articles/security/cve-2014-8489-ping-identity
麥克斯韋公式 – 在歐幾裏得空間的微分形式
Maxwell’s Formulation – Differential Forms on Euclidean Space
Author: Wang Jing
Institute: School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
One of the greatest advances in theoretical physics of the nineteenth century was Maxwell’s formulation of the the equations of electromagnetism. This article uses differential forms to solve a problem related to Maxwell’s formulation. The notion of differential form encompasses such ideas as elements of surface area and volume elements, the work exerted by a force, the flow of a fluid, and the curvature of a surface, space or hyperspace. An important operation on differential forms is exterior differentiation, which generalizes the operators div, grad, curl of vector calculus. the study of differential forms, which was initiated by E.Cartan in the years around 1900, is often termed the exterior differential calculus.However, Maxwell’s equations have many very important implications in the life of a modern person, so much so that people use devices that function off the principles in Maxwell’s equations every day without even knowing it.
Source:
http://ithut.tumblr.com/post/118911586923
Author: Wang Jing
Institute: School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
One of the greatest advances in theoretical physics of the nineteenth century was Maxwell’s formulation of the the equations of electromagnetism. This article uses differential forms to solve a problem related to Maxwell’s formulation. The notion of differential form encompasses such ideas as elements of surface area and volume elements, the work exerted by a force, the flow of a fluid, and the curvature of a surface, space or hyperspace. An important operation on differential forms is exterior differentiation, which generalizes the operators div, grad, curl of vector calculus. the study of differential forms, which was initiated by E.Cartan in the years around 1900, is often termed the exterior differential calculus.However, Maxwell’s equations have many very important implications in the life of a modern person, so much so that people use devices that function off the principles in Maxwell’s equations every day without even knowing it.
Source:
http://ithut.tumblr.com/post/118911586923
Delaunay 三角剖分 – 從 2-D Delaunay 到 3-D Delaynay
Delaunay Triangulation – From 2-D Delaunay to 3-D Delaunay
Author: Wang Jing
Institute: School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Author: Wang Jing
Institute: School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Delaunay triangulations are widely used in scientific computing in many diverse applications. While there are numerous algorithms for computing triangulations, it is the favorable geometric properties of the Delaunay triangulation that make it so useful.
The fundamental property is the Delaunay criterion. In the case of 2-D triangulations, this is often called the empty circumcircle criterion. For a set of points in 2-D, a Delaunay triangulation of these points ensures the circumcircle associated with each triangle contains no other point in its interior. This property is important. In the illustration below, the circumcircle associated with T1 is empty. It does not contain a point in its interior. The circumcircle associated with T2 is empty. It does not contain a point in its interior. This triangulation is a Delaunay triangulation. This presentation discusses how to extend 2-D Delaunay to 3-D Delaynay.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




